salienne

You're viewing

salienne's journal
Create a Dreamwidth Account Learn More

Reload page in style: light

He may argue that while a statute can be read to give the prosecutor a second kick at the cat if conditions change, it cannot be read to allow a court to give the prosecutor a first kick at the cat when conditions change.

To this anticipated argument, we disagree. We wrote K.A.P. We knew what we were saying.

So, tell me how you really feel about this defendant.

Current Mood: sick

"Respondent's perception of coercion flowing from the 'voice of God' is a matter to which the Federal Constitution does not speak."

I love how snarky they Supreme Court can be.

Still, I think Scalia's dissenting opinions are my favorite, even if I do tend to disagree with almost everything he says.